首页> 外文OA文献 >Integrating environmental sustainability considerations into food and nutrition policies : insights from Australia\u27s national food plan
【2h】

Integrating environmental sustainability considerations into food and nutrition policies : insights from Australia\u27s national food plan

机译:将环境可持续性考虑因素纳入食品和营养政策:澳大利亚国家食品计划的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The environmental sustainability (ES) of food systems is a critical challenge for policy makers. This is a highly contested policy area with differing views among stakeholders. The aim of the study was to develop a better understanding of how ES considerations are addressed in Australian food and nutrition policies and the way that consultation processes affect final policy outcomes. A mixed-methods study design combined a detailed chronology of key policy developments (2009-2015), a content analysis of written submissions obtained during the NFP\u27s consultation period (2011-2013) and a frame analysis of the sustainability perspectives - efficiency, demand restraint, and system transformation - in the NFP\u27s Issues, Green, and White Papers. There were 555 written submissions responding to two consultation papers. Stakeholders represented all sectors of Australia\u27s food system including government, non-government organizations, the food supply chain, research and academic institutions, and members of the general public. Around 74% of submissions referred to ES considerations and ~65% supported their inclusion into the final policy. Efficiency frames were most dominant; emphasizing a production-oriented approach that regards the environment as a natural resource base for food production but overlooks consumption and equity concerns. Despite strong support for the inclusion of ES considerations in the NFP, the influence of Australia\u27s socio-political context, powerful, industry-dominated stakeholders, and a reliance on traditional production-oriented perspectives delivered a business-as-usual approach to food policy making. It has since been replaced by an agricultural strategy that provides only cursory attention to ES. Our findings indicate that Australia\u27s political environment is not sufficiently mature for ES considerations to be integrated into food and nutrition policies. We propose reforms to the current consultation process in Australia to better support this integration by promoting greater transparency and participation in the development of food and nutrition policy making.
机译:食品系统的环境可持续性(ES)对决策者而言是一项严峻的挑战。这是一个备受争议的政策领域,各利益相关者之间的观点不一。这项研究的目的是更好地了解澳大利亚食品和营养政策中如何解决ES问题,以及协商过程如何影响最终政策成果。混合方法的研究设计结合了详细的主要政策发展时间顺序(2009-2015年),对NFP咨询期间(2011-2013年)获得的书面意见的内容分析以及对可持续性观点(效率,需求约束和系统转换-在NFP的问题,绿色和白皮书中。共有555份书面意见回应了两份咨询文件。利益相关者代表了澳大利亚食品系统的所有部门,包括政府,非政府组织,食品供应链,研究和学术机构以及公众。大约74%的意见书提到了ES的考虑因素,约65%的意见书支持将其纳入最终政策。效率框架是最主要的;强调以生产为导向的方法,该方法将环境视为粮食生产的自然资源基础,但忽略了消费和公平问题。尽管大力支持将ES的考虑因素纳入NFP,但澳大利亚的社会政治背景,强大的,以行业为主导的利益相关者的影响以及对传统的以生产为导向的观点的依赖仍使食品的一切照旧政策制定。此后,它已被仅能粗略关注ES的农业策略所取代。我们的研究结果表明,澳大利亚的政治环境还不够成熟,无法考虑将ES纳入食品和营养政策。我们建议对澳大利亚当前的磋商程序进行改革,以通过提高透明度和参与制定食品和营养政策来更好地支持这种整合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号